When I requested
Lucretia Rudolph Garfield by Ann Heinrichs, I didn't realize it was written for children. When I picked it up from the library and saw the slim volume with large print, I let it slide--Garfield was in the White House for such a short time, it seemed fitting to read an equally short volume on the life of his wife. I have since discovered a biography more appropriate for adults and that more thoroughly incorporates the large volume of letters written between Lucretia and James: While I will not be reading
Lucretia by John Shaw in full any time soon, I have read the preview available on Google Books and would recommend it over Heinrich's volume for what is likely a richer portrait of this First Lady.
 |
https://www.amazon.com/Lucretia-Rudolph-Garfield-1832-1918-Encyclopedia/dp/0516208462 |
 |
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594541515/ref=x_gr_bb_amazon?ie=UTF8&tag=x_gr_bb_amazon-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1594541515&SubscriptionId=1MGPYB6YW3HWK55XCGG2 |
In fact, the preview available describes Lucretia as having "an acute political sense" (Shaw, p. xv) which I would expect considering how highly educated she was--only the second First Lady to have a college education, according to Heinrichs--but entirely lacking in the volume for children. Shaw's preface goes on to say that Lucretia's "chief role ... was as a moral lodestar" (Shaw, p. xv) for James, but I imagine Shaw's book would give better insight into Lucretia as a more complete and complicated woman of her time. In Heinrichs's story, once Lucretia completed her education, she had little influence beyond that of wife, homemaker, and mother--her most significant contribution to the Garfield administration being the beginnings of a redecorating plan for the White House, and completely content after the death of James to live out her remaining decades on the family farm in Ohio "free of money worries" (Heinrich, p. 90) thanks to her presidential widow's pension won by the hard fight of Julia Tyler. I imagine there is a much more interesting history to be told and would hope that Shaw's book gives a more full portrait.
Indeed, what struck me most from Heinrichs's book was how unusual a marriage Lucretia and James seemed to have compared to their presidential contemporaries. While the wives of Lincoln, Grant, etc. would travel frequently to be with their husbands throughout their pre-presidential careers--to state capitols, to Washington, or even to Civil War encampments--Lucretia and James spent several years of their early marriage living almost entirely apart. I read Heinrichs's description wanting to know much more about they dynamic of their relationship, and, as it turns out, my instinct may have been spot on. In the preview available for Shaw's text, there is talk of infidelity on the part of James and discussion of his contentious relationships/friendships with other women that seems to have put a strain on James's marriage to Lucretia, none of which appears in Heinrichs's account.
It seems, however (from the tellings of both Heinrich and Shaw), that as the years went on, Lucretia and James grew to have a mutually respectful and deeply devoted partnership. So devoted that when Lucretia fell ill with malaria in May 1881, just 2 months after James had been sworn in as president, "James dropped most of his official business to care for his wife," "doted and fussed over her" throughout the month, and traveled with her to the New Jersey shore once the fever broke, not returning to Washington until the end of June (Heinrich, p. 75). Reciprocally, James was shot on July 2, 1881, and died September 19, and Lucretia became famous for her bravery at her husband's bedside over the those months.
While that makes for an commendable love story, all it really made me think about was how little time President Garfield actually spent "presidenting." He basically spent March and April working in an official capacity, spent 2 months at his wife's bedside, and then was on his own death bed for the remainder of his time in office. Obviously, a longer time working than William Henry Harrison, but still shockingly short. And who was really in charge and "doing the work" during those 2.5 months that James Garfield was dying? Did Lucretia have any sway in official decisions while at his bedside, as Woodrow Wilson's wife allegedly did after his stroke in office? And why did the country not use this crisis as a chance to more clearly define how that kind of temporary inability of a president would be officially handled?